Negotiators in Brussels have clinched
a deal on the 2014 EU budget after a night of hard talks, cutting spending by
about 6% compared to 2013. Spending will total 135.5bn euros (£113.3; $181.3bn), or 0.5bn less than the
Commission sought and 0.9bn short of the European Parliament's target. However, the budget is 0.5bn euros bigger than what austerity-conscious
government leaders were demanding.It reflects stricter new terms agreed by EU leaders in February.There will be greater funding for economic growth, jobs, innovation and
humanitarian aid, Lithuania's Deputy Finance Minister Algimantas Rimkunas said
in a statement.
His country currently holds the six-month rotating EU presidency.
EU agencies dealing with migration, asylum and border control will also be
strengthened, as will the European financial supervisory authorities, he
added. About two-thirds of the budget will go on subsidies for farmers and on
development projects in the EU's poorer regions, as in previous years. But the
spending on such projects - called the "cohesion" budget - is being cut by about
7bn euros.
Four governments voted against the compromise deal - the UK, Denmark, the
Netherlands and Sweden, German ARD television reported. They wanted the EU to
make deeper cuts.
The Economic Secretary to the UK Treasury, Nicky Morgan, said the deal showed
that Prime Minister David Cameron's influence was "genuinely bearing down on EU
spending".
"However, the final budget wasn't low enough to gain UK backing. When
governments and families across Europe are taking difficult decisions to make
savings, it would be wrong and irresponsible for the EU to not show similar
restraint," he said.
The deal was reached early on Tuesday after 16 hours of negotiation, and
still requires final approval from the parliament and EU ministers next
week.
'Step in right direction'
The UK Conservative leader in Europe, Richard Ashworth MEP, welcomed "what is
an effective freeze of the EU budget - headline spend is still set to fall by
6%".
He said that "alongside the historic 3.8% reduction which we have secured on
the EU's long-term budget, this is further evidence of us bringing genuine
discipline to EU spending".
"It is particularly welcome that money has been switched away from
less-useful budget headings to the important areas of research and development,
education, training and jobs," he added. He called the budget "a step in the
right direction".
For the UK Liberal Democrats, George Lyon MEP said the budget deal boosted
research and development funding by 200m euros compared to the original
Commission proposal. "That means more money for UK universities, who currently
receive more EU research funding than any other country," he said. There remains some opposition to the deal in the European Parliament,
however.
Helga Truepel MEP of the Greens said it was "a bad deal that will continue
the perpetual cycle of EU under-budgeting".
"With the budget to be reduced 6% compared with 2013, the outcome is not only
devoid of ambition, it will also lead to a situation again next year where the
EU is facing budget shortfalls compared with programmed spending."
The deal, once signed off, should pave the way for the European Parliament to
adopt the EU's long-term trillion-euro budget for 2014-2020. At the same time, the negotiators in Brussels agreed to allocate an extra
3.9bn euros to pay outstanding bills for 2013 incurred in cohesion projects.
An additional 400.5m euros will also be spent from the EU "solidarity" fund
to help areas of Germany, the Czech Republic, Austria and Romania which were hit
by flooding this year.
2 comments:
The eurozone's strategy of trying to drive down wage costs across Southern Europe through deflation is leading to a debt trap and is ultimately unworkable, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has warned.
The OECD said the global economy remains extremely fragile, highlighting the danger of "virulent episodes" in emerging markets as the US Federal Reserve starts to withdraw global dollar liquidity.
There is a risk that any emerging market crisis could be large enough to short-circuit global recovery altogether.
The OECD highlight a number of important points which lead to the conclusion that QE will be larger and last longer than markets currently expect and QE will be implemented in the EZ.
1, Each recovery from the 1980's - present has become progressively weaker. From 17% in the 80's to 3% today. Demographics + regulatory + over-indebtedness = central banks are last wall of defense.
2. Global sovereigns have increased debt exponentially over last 30 years with little return on investment! Continued deficit spending is ultimately self defeating.
3. The Euro is the problem for Europe. Internal imbalances require variable exchange rates which currently do not exist.
4. Emerging markets have not restructured sufficiently to absorb a macro shock.
The political will to implement necessary reforms is lacking globally + the time lags required for success are not politically expedient. The central banks will continue to provide massive liquidity with the hope that governments implement the necessary changes. By providing the liquidity at the levels currently, governments wrongly assume that the situation is self healing. The cycle continues to re-enforce itself until QE has a negative impact on financial assets.
Post a Comment