EUROPEAN UNION —The European Central Bank should police the more than 6,000 banks in
the euro zone, the European Union's executive said Friday, setting itself up for
a clash with Germany, which wants to retain oversight over smaller lenders. A proposal from the European Commission, to be finalized in coming days, will
call for the central bank to set up an agency to take responsibility for
supervision of all banks in the 17-nation currency area. The proposal follows a
June decision from euro-zone leaders who wanted the supervisor created as a step
to break the "vicious circle" between weak banks and governments with strained
finances that have eroded confidence in the euro zone. The proposal, however,
falls far short of creating the true "banking union" that the ECB and the
commission have called for. It doesn't set up a regional fund for guaranteeing
bank deposits or give powers to euro-zone agencies to wind down or restructure
shaky banks and distribute losses among investors. The ECB would, however, be
able to take operating licenses away from unstable lenders. The supervisory
agency would be run by a separate decision-making panel at arm's length from the
ECB, in an effort to prevent conflicts of interests with the central bank's main
role of fighting inflation and to allow EU states that don't use the euro to
join. As the supervisor, the ECB would have to make sure banks build up sufficient
capital levels to absorb economic and financial shocks—such as the real-estate
crashes that triggered the Irish and Spanish problems or over-investments in
shoddy products like the U.S. subprime mortgages that sank banks across Europe
in 2008.The threat to withdraw a license would be the ECB's most potent
enforcement tool. "That's the first crucial element: to empower the European
supervisor with the right to withdraw the license," said Guntram Wolff, deputy
director of Brussels-based think tank Bruegel. But other powers and
responsibilities that are central to creating a unified banking framework for
the euro zone would remain in national hands. Proposals that would force private
investors to share the burden—for instance by converting debt into equity once a
bank's capital falls below are certain level—aren't set to come into force until
2018. In a sign of possible movement, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble,
in an opinion piece in the Financial Times Friday, said the so-called bail-in
mechanism should already come into force in 2015. (WSJ)
1 comment:
Banks got over-invested in an asset class, mortgage-backed securities, that was in a bubble. The bubble collapsed, leaving most Banks illiquid and some insolvent. QE rescued the Banking and financial system, but then individuals started paying down debt. That created a debt-deflation recession, and those tend to be long-lasting because the de-leveraging by consumers is pro-cyclical. Paying down debt cuts demand and consumption, which makes the recession last longer.
This isn't rocket science and it doesn't need any exotic explanations. It needs time to restore confidence so that consumers start spending again.
And things "seem" to be getting worse. Well, things often "seem" this and that, but if you take the trouble to look at the numbers, the US has already recovered to pre-crisis levels. Europe has a self-imposed problem with its completely mad 'austerity" driving the recession ever deeper, and the UK, as always, is somewhere in between.
If you look at the crisis chronologically, it makes sense and you don't have to come up with a lot of hyperbole and ideology to understand it.
Post a Comment