Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Romania has been rocked by political turmoil after parliament suspended President Traian Basescu from office, paving the way for a referendum on his future later this month. The procedure comes despite European Union and U.S. concerns over the status of democracy in the former communist nation.  Basescu was suspended from his job Saturday after 256 legislators voted in favor of a procedure that could lead to him being permanently removed from office. Only 114 lawmakers were against the action. Senate Speaker Crin Antonescu was appointed interim president.  Reacting to the vote, Basescu said he will now prepare for the July 29 referendum when Romanians will get a final say on his fate.  Basescu survived a similar vote in 2007. Analysts say he faces a tougher challenge this time, in part because of his declining popularity in a period of economic crisis in this nation of 19 million people.  Additionally, a recently adopted law requires only a simple majority of votes to push him out. Before, the requirements were more demanding. Romania's ruling center-left coalition says Basescu should leave office because he overstepped his authority and interfered in the government's work since his re-election in 2009.  In one of the latest stand-offs, a public quarrel emerged between the president and Prime Minister Victor Ponta over who should represent the country at a European Union summit. The Basescu has also been accused of alleged harsh remarks towards gypsies, also known as Roma, and disabled people, though the president has denied wrongdoing.  He told parliament before the suspension vote, the real reasons why the prime minister wants him to go is to increase his own power. Unlike in some European nations, Romania's president is chosen by popular vote and is in charge of foreign policy, the powerful intelligence services and the country’s defense policies.  The latest moves have prompted the U.S. and the EU to express worries over Romania's democratic credentials. The U.S. State Department said in a statement that it was concerned that developments in the country “threaten democratic checks and balances."  The EU's executive body, the European Commission, has also urged the government not to reduce the effectiveness of democratic principles and institutions, as the explained by commission spokesman Olivier Bailly.  "The rule of law, the democratic checks and balances and the independence of the judiciary are cornerstones of European democracy and indispensable for mutual trust within the European Union. Government policy and political action must respect these principles and values."
Bailly added that the latest developments threaten progress that was made in these areas since Romania joined the EU in 2007.  In addition to Basescu, Prime Minister Ponta has also come under opposition pressure to resign after an academic panel concluded that he copied a significant part of his doctoral thesis from other authors without proper attribution. Ponta, who calls the charges politically motivated, says they have been orchestrated by an adviser to Basescu.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Under the terms of the bank bailout's draft memorandum of understanding, seen by Reuters, The Guardian and El Economista, 14 banking groups that make up about 90pc of the banking system will be tested for their recapitlisation needs in a review due to be completed by the second half of September.

"The Spanish authorities and the European Commission will assess the viability of the banks on the basis of the results of the Stress Test and the restructuring plans. Banks that are deemed to be non-viable will be resolved in an orderly manner," said the document.

All Spain's banks will have to increase their core capital ratios to 9pc by the end of 2012 and keep them at this level until the end of 2014.

In a particular focus on Spain's saving banks, or cajas, Spanish authorities will prepare by the end of November a new law to reduce the stakes that savings banks have in commercial lenders to non-controlling levels.

The draft also states that Spain needs to present a blueprint for structural reforms that will help bring down its deficit.

Anonymous said...

Schäuble Warns of Market Turmoil

German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble told the country's top court on Tuesday that any significant delay in approving the EU's permanent bailout fund could fuel financial market turbulence.

"A considerable postponement of the ESM (the European Stability Mechanism bailout fund) which was foreseen for July of this year could cause considerable further uncertainty on markets beyond Germany and a considerable loss of trust in the euro zone's ability to make necessary decisions in an appropriate timeframe," Schäuble said."




"Doubts about the constitutional possibility or the readiness of Germany to stem dangers for the financial stability of the euro zone could lead to the current crisis symptoms being exacerbated considerably," Schäuble warned. "Some member states of the euro zone would end up having further big problems financing themselves, which could raise questions over the stability of the euro zone as a whole."

Several complaints were filed with the court on June 29 after the ESM and the fiscal pact were approved by Germany's parliament, the Bundestag, and its upper legislative chamber, the Bundesrat.

Among the plaintiffs are the parliamentary group of the left-wing Left Party, the conservative Bavarian politician Peter Gauweiler and an association called "More Democracy," which has 12,000 co-plaintiffs.

Anonymous said...

Germany Constitutional Court not likely to rule on ESM and Fiscal Pact for 3 months.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/german-court-may-take-longer-to-rule-on-euro-measures-a-843560.html

This is being taken by commentators to mean, that they would otherwise have granted the injunctions, which could cause markets to assume, in their excitable way, that this meant the measures had been rejected.

This way, at least, it's only three months, rather than six months wait, which is standard for a judgement from the court.

Anonymous said...

Mario Monti made 2 very important comments yesterday.

1. He won't be serving another term on government.
2. If Italy could draw on the ESM like Spain without any oversight from any of the Troika members, then Italy would look to borrow to reduce the deficit.......

So, basically, Italy needs a bailout and I won't be hanging around to take the blame!

Anonymous said...

A savers' revolt is already brewing in Spain among those who bought preference shares and junior bonds, amid claims that they were misled by local bank managers who sold them as risk-free saving products paying up to 7% interest.

So the Cajas, having run out of credit, mis-sold their own shares to their customers. A Ponzi scheme, basically.

That's reprehensible, but actually a demonstration of the necessity of european bank regulation, I would think.

Anonymous said...

Turn "Too big to fail" into "Too little to worry about". Banking crisis CAN be fixed forever.

1. Seperate Casino Banking and Retail Banking
2. Have many small managable banks instead of a few unmanagable ones
3. Abolish "Self-regulation"
4. Exercise strict control over "Structured Products"
5. Make Tax-avoidance scheme a criminal offence
6. Tax those financial institutions which outsource at a higher rate(Employing local staff helps local economies)
7. Enforce strict limits on bonuses in order to eliminate short-termism
8. Make the markets harder for speculators to operate in
9. Subject market manipulation to revokation of trading licenses rather than a pultry fine (relatively speaking)
10. There a thousand ways to to correct the situation if politicians had the public good at heart rather than lobbyists money in their pockets.

Oh, prohibit politicians from ever working for financial institution (this is a coflict of interest if ever there was one). Ask JP Morgan to fire Tony Blair.

Anonymous said...

Why don't they just organise an orderly disintergration of the Euro,... The EU is so undemocratic I for one don't want 'further intergration' with them

Are you aware that the vast majority of the EZ citizens, or at least their elected representatives, want to keep the euro functioning? Even in Greece, the country where keeping the euro can be seen as implying the worse efforts, the four major parties, including radical left Syriza, want Greece to stay in the EZ. So it's because the EU is democratic that those representants don't organize a 'disintergration' of the Euro.

And personally, as someone paid in euros, paying taxes in euros, and having some economies libelled in euros, I would prefer if you didn't call for the 'disintergration' of the currency I happen to use. Thanks in advance