So what are we expecting from this summit? The leaders divide into two camps -
the fiscally conservative northern countries and those in the south and east
that stand to benefit from more money for infrastructure and agriculture. It is
believed that in the build up to the summit some consensus was reached around a
budget of €950m - which would be a reduction on the last seven-year spending
cycle. This will please the northern bloc. But it is also believed that in a
concession to the south, the bulk of the spending, around 40%, would still go on
agriculture and related farm subsidies. Indeed, two of the biggest recipients of
farm spending - France and Italy - have hinted they could block the budget
unless their appropriations are maintained. It is far from clear that the
leaders will reach an agreement this time round, though if talks collapse its
possible no resolution will be reached until late 2014.,,,Angela Merkel seems
pessimistic on the prospect of resolution at this summit. I can't say
whether we will be successful, the positions are still far apart. For Germany I
can say that we will do everything for such an agreement to materialize because
it is very important in a time of economic uncertainty and high unemployment to
have a plan. We have to be careful with the way we spend but also show
solidarity between net contributors and recipients. Whether we will have a
joint vote or whether we will get into a situation where we will have annual
tranches in the future I can't say today. It would be desirable to have a joint
result but we have to wait and work hard, and that's what I will do....Well
now... Why do central bankers and Treasurers from around the world invariably
insult our collective intelligence with bland assurances that the euro/US
dollar/sterling is in good shape/has weathered the storm/will gradually recover
when it is so blindingly obvious that these statements are untrue? Not only are
these statements patently false but the people who make them are almost
invariably implicated in the processes that created or exacerbated these
problems in the first place. If they do it to try to convince the bond and
currency markets, then they are doubly stupid because markets are operated by
real people putting real money on the line that generally have a low tolerance
for bullshit.... Dragi thinks we are the fools that his tin pot immoral and
primitive theory of the justification of unaccountable rule by selfish self
enrichers defines us as. We are ignorant little people to whom he can feed any
lie he likes. He thinks we shall swallow it as if thinking Tizer were little
more than a tasty form of the latest exotic continental Lager. He and his
kind shall soon be spat out with the same force as a proper beer drinker would
Tizer if anyone were so foolish to attempt such a wildly insulting trick.
With apologies to Tizer for coming anywhere close to such unpleasant
people, if only, by way of metaphor.
3 comments:
Proposals tabled early on Friday morning for Brussels budgets for the period 2014 to 2020 would slash the EU's spending by £30 billion between 2014 and 2020 compared to current levels of spending.
The historic cuts package tabled by Herman Van Rompuy, the EU president, after a bitter battle between the Prime Minister and François Hollande, the French President, could save the British taxpayer up to £500 million a year.
A "negotiating box" was tabled at 6.30am on Friday morning and the first ever that reduces EU expenditure was close to agreement after Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, threw Germany's weight behind Britain during almost 20 hours of gruelling talks.
"For the first time in the EU's history there will be a real budget cut," said Dalia Grybauskaite, Lithuania's President and former EU budget commissioner during the last seven year Brussels spending round in 2005.
The cuts include a £1.7 billion reduction in the size of the EU's administrative budget.
As cargill55 wrote below:
"' Victory for David Cameron as EU budget is cut for first time in history'We still pay £15 billion a year budget contributions to the corrupt, anti democratic and wasteful EU.
£500 billion a year is a drop in the ocean compared to the £65 billion total annual EU costs fro Britain.
Britain is still the loser in the EU."
Hundreds of thousands of our fathers, grandfathers and Allies died horrible, gruesome deaths in WWII so that Britain would be free of European domination, exploitation and control.
Many more gave their limbs, their blood, their futures, their hopes and dreams.
Did they all suffer and die in vain?
Take out your family albums .... look into their eyes.
Since Hollande comes from a country, France, and a party, Socialist, who consistently spend money they do not have to a spectacularly irresponsible degree and make up a part of the shortfall by squeezing french businesses to the verge of bankruptcy it comes as no surprise that he wishes to promulgate the same system in the EU !!!
Post a Comment