Friday, June 14, 2013

Oskar Lafontaine, the German finance minister who launched the euro, has called for a break-up of the single currency to let southern Europe recover, warning that the current course is "leading to disaster".  "The economic situation is worsening from month to month, and unemployment has reached a level that puts democratic structures ever more in doubt," he said.  "The Germans have not yet realized that southern Europe, including France, will be forced by their current misery to fight back against German hegemony sooner or later," he said, blaming much of the crisis on Germany's wage squeeze to gain export share.  Mr. Lafontaine said on the parliamentary website of Germany's Left Party that Chancellor Angela Merkel will "awake from her self-righteous slumber" once the countries in trouble unite to force a change in crisis policy at Germany's expense. His prediction appeared confirmed as French finance minister Pierre Moscovici yesterday proclaimed the end of austerity and a triumph of French policy, risking further damage to the tattered relations between Paris and Berlin.  "Austerity is finished. This is a decisive turn in the history of the EU project since the euro," he told French TV. "We're seeing the end of austerity dogma. It's a victory of the French point of view." ... Lafontaine is widely regarded as a joke and a failed politician in Germany, so its only fitting when AEP is basing his arguments on him .... The immediate problem with the Euro is essentially in not having a single borrowing authority issuing Euro bonds - as I argued. This does not require a single European government,  just better financial coordination.  The big problem with "Europe" is the need for a unanimous vote on big issues - and that's hard to overcome in the fractious atmosphere caused by the counter-productive austerity a outrange mind- set currently in fashion. But there are signs that this suicidal approach to finance and economics is coming to an end in Europe at least.  But where is the European leader (or couple of leaders) we need to push (for reducing waste of course) for investing in the future and making sure any "easing" goes to lending to those, government and private, entities that are investing and providing knowledge and jobs for the future? Investing in education, job training, research and development will bring in private investment.  But when people spoke of a president for Europe Tony Blair's name was bandied about! We in Europe need politicians who aren't smeared with the past or chained by ideology, but look out with clear eyes on what went wrong and how to put it right. The next generation must be given a chance towards meeting the immense challenges faced not just by Europe but by all humanity. 

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Wolfgang Münchau of the FT reckons the Eurozone crisis will last 20 years see http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c9de...

Optimistically the Bundersbank chief reckons it will only last another ten years see http://euobserver.com/economic...

Either way the PIIGS are in for long term poverty with high employment.

Anonymous said...

BRUSSELS - The EU and the US will soon be launching negotiations for a Transatlantic Trade and lnvestment Partnership (TTIP), one of the most ambitious bilateral initiatives in the world to create jobs and growth through trade and investment.

The United States and the European Union represent about half of the world output and are responsible for almost one third of global trade flows. In fact, annual bilateral trade of goods and services account yearly for almost one trillion dollars while

aggregate investment stock are in excess of € 2 trillion.

Huge benefits are expected from this initiative. According to the estimates of the European Commission an ambitious and comprehensive agreement would bring overall annual gains of 0.4% of GDP. The economic situation in Europe obliges us to



be proactive. We have to provide our companies and professionals with the best possible conditions to provide their goods and services in both markets.

We are now preparing the negotiations on both sides of the Atlantic. Our challenge is much deeper than traditional barriers such as tariffs. We need to tap the unexploited potential of our bilateral relations by tackling limitations on investment, public procurement, trade in services and intellectual property. We will also be seeking to find innovative methods to avoid unnecessary costs to business posed by technical regulation. Whilst at the same time ensuring the protection of health, security, labour standards, the environment, and the preservation of our cultural values.

We are also committed to talking about our regulatory systems and learning from the experience of companies, regulatory authorities and all relevant stakeholders. We believe Europe and the United States can show that is possible to reconcile different regulatory approaches if there is the determination to do it. For some sectors we will have to improve the existing agreements for mutual recognition, in other cases we will have to commit to develop rules that are not equal, but at least equivalent. And for many new sectors we are ready to agree on common regulations.