A US appeals court panel has said that federal officials
must reconsider their decision not to regulate the size of airline seats as a
safety issue. In a ruling on Friday, one of the judges called it “the case of
the incredible shrinking airline seat”. The
Flyers Rights passenger group challenged the Federal Aviation Administration in
court after the agency rejected its request to write rules governing seat size
and the distance between rows of seats. New
York senator calls for FAA action over 'shrinkage' of airplane seats A
three-judge panel for the federal appeals court in Washington said the FAA had
relied on outdated or irrelevant tests and studies before deciding that seat
spacing was a matter of comfort, not safety.
The judges sent the issue back to the FAA and said the agency must come
up with a better-reasoned response to the group’s safety concerns. “We applaud the court’s decision, and the
path to larger seats has suddenly become a bit wider,” said Kendall Creighton,
a spokeswoman for Flyers Rights. The
passenger group says small seats bunched too close together slow down emergency
evacuations and raise the danger of travellers developing vein clots. FAA spokesman Ian Gregor said the agency was
considering the ruling and its next steps. He said the FAA considers the
spacing between seat rows when testing to make sure airliners can be evacuated
safely.
No comments:
Post a Comment