In speeches and interviews, Juncker has always claimed that Luxembourg has in no way enriched itself "at the expense of its neighboring countries," and especially not by encouraging tax avoidance. In everyday political life, however, Juncker's people fought for precisely the kinds of corporate advantages their boss used such rich language to denounce. In order to attract as much corporate money as possible into the country, his officials played around with tax models like "hybrid financial instruments" and, especially, so-called "patent boxes." Introduced in order to spur technological advancement, finance policy experts in Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg led the pack in transforming tax advantages into an instrument allowing corporations to steer proceeds from patents or licenses to their Benelux subsidiaries in order to pay lower taxes there. Under the system, national subsidiaries of large corporations in countries with higher corporate tax rates would pay large patent and licensing fees to subsidiaries in lower tax countries. The system ensured that money got pumped into the government coffers of the Benelux countries, but it also put other EU countries at a disadvantage, in addition to the majority of small- and middle-sized businesses for whom such preferential treatment wouldn't even be considered. Representatives of the other EU member states knew very well what was going on. The German representative in the Working Group on Tax Questions, for example, filed a cable to Berlin in March 2013 in which he noted there had been repeated "doubts about the harmlessness" of a few of the tax models, "mostly having to do with the license box rules of LUX and NDL," the abbreviations being references to Luxembourg and the Netherlands. But nothing was done about it for years. Each time the Working Group on Tax Questions proposed changes, Luxembourg, Belgium and the Netherlands warded them off successfully. It's no wonder, either, given that representatives of the Benelux countries regularly coordinated their decisions in advance at their own meetings... It's not just European Commission President Juncker whose past as the leader of the tax-haven Luxembourg is catching up to him. Another important man at the top of an EU institution also now has some uncomfortable questions to answer: Dutch Finance Minister Jeroen Dijsselbloem. Even after ascending to his current position as head of the Euro Group, his country continued to block every call for change. Sven Giegold, 45, has spent years trying to shed light on the darkness of EU corporate taxation arrangements. A member of the European Parliament with the Green Party, he's used to resistance. But what he experienced when he requested access to meeting transcripts from the secretive tax groups was an altogether new experience. First, the European Council stonewalled and then the European Commission delivered documents in which important sections had been redacted. Despite all the blacked out passages, Giegold was forbidden from bringing his mobile phone into the room in one of the Commission's buildings in Brussels where he was allowed to view a few of the documents. Officials allowed him to take notes using a pencil and paper, but they didn't let him take his notes with him when he left the building. The documents seen by SPIEGEL reveal that what EU agencies have long been denying, is in fact mass-scale cheating with the help of the tax law. Internal EU documents show how companies took advantage of patent boxes to simply sign their licenses, copyrights, patents or marketing rights over to their subsidiaries in Luxembourg or The Hague, allowing them to cash in on sweetheart corporate tax deals in those countries. It didn't matter whether the research had actually taken place in those nations, either.
Monday, November 16, 2015
Sunday, November 15, 2015

Premierul desemnat Dacian Cioloş a anunţat, astăzi, echipa de miniştri, într-o conferință de presă, la Camera Deputaților.
Astfel, lista membrilor Guvernului propusă de Dacian Cioloş este:
Vicepremier şi Ministrul Economiei: Costin Grigore Borc
Vicepremier şi Ministrul Dezvoltării: Vasile Dâncu
Ministrul Afacerilor Externe: Lazăr Comănescu
Ministrul Afacerilor Interne: Petre Tobă
Ministrul Agriculturii: Achim Irimescu
Ministrul Apărării Naţionale: Mihnea Motoc
Ministrul Culturii: Vlad Alexandrescu
Ministrul Energiei: Victor Vlad Grigorescu
Ministrul Educaţiei: Adrian Curaj
Ministrul Finanţelor Publice: Anca Paliu Dragu
Ministrul Fondurilor Europene: Aura Carmen Răducu
Ministrul Justiţiei: Cristina Guseth
Ministrul Mediului, Apelor și Pădurilor: Cristiana Paşca Palmer
Ministrul Muncii: Claudia Anca Moarcăş
Ministrul pentru Societatea Informaţională: Marius Raul Bostan
Ministrul Sănătăţii: Andrei Baciu
Ministrul Tineretului și Sportului: Elisabeta Lipă
Ministrul Transporturilor: Marian Costescu
Ministrul pentru Dialog Social: Violeta Alexandru
Şeful Cancelariei Primului Ministru: Ioan Dragoş Tudorache
Ministrul delegat pentru Relaţiile cu Românii de Preturindeni: Dan Stoenescu
Ministrul delegat pentru Relaţia cu Parlamentul şi Societatea Civilă: Cristian Ciprian Bucur.
Astfel, lista membrilor Guvernului propusă de Dacian Cioloş este:
Vicepremier şi Ministrul Economiei: Costin Grigore Borc
Vicepremier şi Ministrul Dezvoltării: Vasile Dâncu
Ministrul Afacerilor Externe: Lazăr Comănescu
Ministrul Afacerilor Interne: Petre Tobă
Ministrul Agriculturii: Achim Irimescu
Ministrul Apărării Naţionale: Mihnea Motoc
Ministrul Culturii: Vlad Alexandrescu
Ministrul Energiei: Victor Vlad Grigorescu
Ministrul Educaţiei: Adrian Curaj
Ministrul Finanţelor Publice: Anca Paliu Dragu
Ministrul Fondurilor Europene: Aura Carmen Răducu
Ministrul Justiţiei: Cristina Guseth
Ministrul Mediului, Apelor și Pădurilor: Cristiana Paşca Palmer
Ministrul Muncii: Claudia Anca Moarcăş
Ministrul pentru Societatea Informaţională: Marius Raul Bostan
Ministrul Sănătăţii: Andrei Baciu
Ministrul Tineretului și Sportului: Elisabeta Lipă
Ministrul Transporturilor: Marian Costescu
Ministrul pentru Dialog Social: Violeta Alexandru
Şeful Cancelariei Primului Ministru: Ioan Dragoş Tudorache
Ministrul delegat pentru Relaţiile cu Românii de Preturindeni: Dan Stoenescu
Ministrul delegat pentru Relaţia cu Parlamentul şi Societatea Civilă: Cristian Ciprian Bucur.
The Russian president, Vladimir Putin, has suspended flights to Egypt, a Kremlin spokesman has said. The move came after the head of the Russian federal security service suggested it would be “expedient” to suspend flights until the conclusion of the investigation into what brought down a Russian-operated airliner over the Sinai peninsula on Saturday, killing all 224 people on board. Russia had previously suggested the UK was pre-judging the outcome of the investigation when it and Ireland suspended flights on Wednesday to and from the Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh. The UK prime minister, David Cameron, has said it was “more likely than not” a bomb brought down the Metrojet Airbus A321-200. “I think it will be reasonable to suspend all Russian flights to Egypt until we determine the real reasons of what happened,” Russian intelligence chief Alexander Bortnikov said in televised comments shortly before the Kremlin announced the suspension. “It concerns tourist flights most of all.” Dmitry Peskov, the Kremin spokesman, said Putin was not suspending flights until the end of the crash investigation, but only until flight safety could be guaranteed, state news agency Tass reported. “We need to make a clarification here: The president meant a suspension of air travel with Egypt until it is possible to establish the necessary safety level for air travel,” Peskov said. Putin also ordered the Russian government to establish mechanisms to bring its citizens home, Peskov said. Around 45,000 Russians are currently on holiday in Egypt, Oleg Safonov, the head of Russia’s state tourism agency, Rostourism, told Tass.
Saturday, November 14, 2015
Paris terror attacks an alarm bell for a borderless Europe - adio Shengen !
What to do - a few things that the European countries should do :
1. Leave EU. It serves no useful purpose.
2. Profile. Close borders to anyone who will not quickly and easily assimilate into British society.
3.Intern. Extreme threat calls for extreme counter measures .
4. Expel. (See 2 above.)
5. Never again allow those stupide idiot politicians who allowed my precious country to be so defiled , the oxygen to repeat their multi-cultural enrichment lies...
2. Profile. Close borders to anyone who will not quickly and easily assimilate into British society.
3.Intern. Extreme threat calls for extreme counter measures .
4. Expel. (See 2 above.)
5. Never again allow those stupide idiot politicians who allowed my precious country to be so defiled , the oxygen to repeat their multi-cultural enrichment lies...
How do you close the barn door? The enemy is both within and without and it's all because of the EU. You, Europens need to get out of the EU before you're totally Merkelized...Above all, we must realise that although this atrocity will change things in France quite profoundly, it is an alarm call to the rest of Europe, to us, and to the whole of Western civilization.

OK, there would probably be a free trade agreement (but even this is not guaranteed), but free trade is a very pale imitation of membership of a true single market and customs union with common technical standards across an entire Continent and a home market of 500 million people as currently enjoyed. That risk in itself should be enough to trigger every PLC and AIM listed company to publish details of the threats that an EU exit could cause to their business. Fourth, membership of the EU is not party political so it is not like a company supporting a given political party at all. it goes to the heart of how this country will structure its development, not for 5 short years but for the foreseeable future. Fifth, EU membership is a bit of a package, and some to the right of the Tory party and in the Telegraph may campaign for example for an end to "social Europe" but that is not a universally held belief across all business. My firm offers all staff a minimum of four weeks paid holiday every year. Because of EU laws, so must our competitors. If that power were to be repatriated, and the UK Parliament with a majority Government elected by just 33% of the voting public were to repeal that, competitors may cut costs not be raising their efficiency (which would be legitimate) but by slashing social standards and maybe cutting holidays. If my firm does the right thing and maintains 4 weeks paid holiday, we are put at an unfair competitive disadvantage, not due to greater efficiency elsewhere, but by companies cutting costs by reducing social protection. In a race to the bottom of that kind, UK productivity will never rise, and of course we will always lose against cheap labour in Asia and Latin America. Finally, the opinions offered are often those of the CEO or senior management. They are entitled to express their personal views just as much as any journalist or member of the public and frankly will know more about the real consequences of leaving the EU than most of us, including most journalists. And if they perceive a threat to jobs and investment in the UK they not only have the right to express it but a duty to do so.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)