Since Brussels is quite happy to ignore referendum results it doesn't like,
it's hardly n a good position to lecture others about democracy.
People in Eastern Europe have a healthy attachement to actual results. That's
why they get impatient with the endless process-driven talk and de facto status
quo and paralysis in most of the West (perfectly represented by EU institutions
themselves). So it is more likely to get radical ideas and non-standard
politicians in the East than in the West. East embraced nationalism,
clericalism, fascism, socialism, communism, capitalism, whatever came along as
long as the perception by people was that things might get better.
People in the east go for the jugular, game the systems, and in general act
in self-serving ways. This can be annoying, but is is also more honest and
authentic. Capitalism in the east very quickly disintagrated into plutocracy,
abuse of labor rights, tunneling of companies, and a general kleptocracy -
things that took a lot longer in the West, although it is clearly happening in
the West right now.
People in the West need to understand that abstract "systems" that don't
deliver results are just that: empty verbiage surrounding well-hidden and
self-serving power. The East provides a mirror: there can be no truly free media
that is owned by private interests, there can be no general prosperity in
dog-eats-dog capitalism, there is no such thing as "meritocracy" any more in the
West than there is one in the East, and maybe there is no such thing as "liberal
democracy", only better and worse ways to run a society.
The ugly truth is that without self-restraint by the powerful, without
growing wealth, and without external unifying threats, all these pathologies
from th East are appearing the West. The political threat of communism made the
prosperity and balanced societies the West possible (maybe inevitable). That's
gone, how are we going to do the right thing without this external
threat?
1 comment:
AFP - Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed into law a controversial bill passed by parliament that brands NGOs who receive funding from abroad as "foreign agents", the Kremlin said Saturday.tin
The law, which has caused huge concern among activists who fear it will be used to stigmatise critical NGOs, was signed by Putin after it was rushed through the lower and upper houses of parliament before their summer breaks.
Putin "signed the federal law on regulating the activities of Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) who carry out the role of a foreign agent", the Kremlin said in a statement.
The law, which sailed through the State Duma lower house on July 13 and then the upper house Federation Council on July 18, requires NGOs who receive foreign funding to register with the authorities as foreign agents.
The NGOs will have to allow official checks of their income, accounting and management structure as well as regularly make public their sources of income and their management.
Analysts believe the law appears to be a response to the criticism by NGO election watchdogs of December parliamentary polls and the March presidential elections won by Putin which were followed by mass anti-Kremlin protests.
Putin has lashed out at foreign-funded Russian election NGOs such as the watchdog Golos, whose evidence of vote-rigging was used by the opposition to back claims the polls were illegitimate.
Post a Comment