Agreement among the WTO’s 159 member economies

Ministers meeting in Bali sealed agreement among the WTO’s 159 member economies for the pact, which eases barriers to trade by simplifying customs procedures, limiting agricultural subsidies, and promoting trade with least-developed nations. 

The deal could boost global trade by $1 trillion and create 20 million new jobs, keeps alive the WTO’s broader 12-year marathon Doha Round of trade negotiations designed to reduce international tariff barriers, well ...I've just found out that governments from the United States to Australia and from Canada to the EU are secretly negotiating trade deals that will give global corporations the right to sue our governments and overturn our laws.

Details have leaked out on what is called the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) that will massively expand the power of corporations to sue our governments.

Thousands of corporate lobbyists are helping to write these secret pacts -- but we're not allowed to see them. Governments know that we won't like these corporate power grabs, so they're hoping to keep them under the radar until it's too late to stop them. But if we can raise our voices now, we can expose these corporate charters and kill the deals forever.

Two secret new global pacts- the TTIP and TPP -could massively increase the power of corporations to sue our governments when they pass laws to protect our environment or our health. Unsurprised, its just four companies talking to each other - 8 largest U.S. financial companies (JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, U.S. Bancorp, Bank of New York Mellon and Morgan Stanley) are 100% controlled by 10 shareholders and we have 4 companies always present i...n all decisions: BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity - who control the Federal Reserve. The same “big four” control the vast majority of European companies counted on the stock exchange. These same people run the IMF, the European Central Bank & the World Bank. The 10 largest US financial institutions hold 54% of US total financial assets. 90% of US media is owned by 6 corporations. We will tell you what the news is - the news is what we say it is - it turns out it is not illegal to falsify the news. 37 banks have merged to become just four since 1990. We are speaking of 6, 8 or maybe 12 families who truly dominate the world (perhaps Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Loebs Kuh and Lehmans in New York, the Rothschilds of Paris and London, the Warburgs of Hamburg, Paris and Lazards Israel Moses Seifs Rome). With Google accounting for over 65% of all web searches in the US and over 70% market share in most other countries, the top 10 owners of Google’s stock are Fidelity, BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard Group, Capital Research, T. Rowe Price, Capital World, Alliancebernstein, Marsico Capital. This is the world we live in.

Opinion ....2...

Disaster was visited on the global economy 40 years ago with the Nixon 'shock' - the disengagement between the dollar and gold and other currencies with gold via their linkage with the dollar. That is the demise of the Bretton Woods agreement.
With the end of that arrangement countries were now free to create as much money as they liked and run as big a trade deficit as they liked. Under Bretton Woods, any trade defict had to be quickly reversed by cutting demand to maintain parity with the dollar and therefore gold
In 1963 Reginald Maudling tried to stimulate the UK economy only for UK business to fail to meet demand and so sucked in imports. That stimulus had to be quickly reversed. The same 10 years later with Anthony Barbour. The failure of Brits to create wealth goes back way before Margaret Thatcher. And way before GCSEs - but that's another matter.
Of course, Germany was the exception as the Bundesbank was not about to engage in this game of Monopoly.
Like all frauds, it starts small and the fraudster, having got away with it, then becomes more ambitious.
By 2007 the global economy had split into two camps - those who could create wealth, Germany (being smart and well-organised) and China (using slave labour) being the two prme examples, and those who could only consume wealth, the UK and US being the best examples. The US having exported a large chunk of its wealth creating capacity to the likes of China for the benefit of the few
The circle being squared with debt.
The Anglo-saxons convinced themseleves that crazy maths could be used to make even the worst debt perform.
In an attempt to maintain this farce from 2008 onwards the fraudsters now went one better by a quasi-monetisation of debt, quantative easing. Rather than solve the basic problem of not creating wealth they reach for their trusty tools of deceit and fraud.
Having got over the last few years with quasi-monestisation the UK, like all confident fraudsters, now becomes more confident and goes for full monetisation as Osborne claws back interest payments on bonds owned bythe BoE. One of the attributes of fraudsters is being adept at the use of convoluted logic to defy logic.
Eventually they will also write off the capital value of these bonds.
That gives a short breathing space but just as qe has solved nothing neither will that. The 'grand plan' seems to hope something will turn up.
But still there is this huge global trade imbalance that is being addressed by the default of everything just winding down as the there are fewer and fewer buyers for the sellers.

No bailouts - Barklays

Barclays boss Bob Diamond has said that taxpayers should not bail out banks, and that those banks that get into trouble should be allowed to fail. "It is not OK for taxpayers to bail out banks," Mr Diamond told a Treasury Committee hearing. On bonuses, he said that Barclays "paid for performance, not for failure". The government has called on banks to pay smaller bonuses, with Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg urging them to be "sensitive to the public mood". Mr Diamond said that Barclays had yet to decide on bonus payments to its staff for this year. He added that the "majority" of the amount paid in bonuses went to investment bankers, rather than staff in the retail banking arm. "We are sensitive, we are listening [to calls for restraint], and there is no lack of effort in recognising the importance of this issue and being responsible [over bonuses]," he said. He said that Barclays had "no intention of paying more in bonuses than is necessary". However, he said the bank had to balance these responsibilities with "the environment we operate in", referring to the fact that if Barclays were to unilaterally reduce bonuses, top staff could leave to join competitors. He said he had waived his bonus for the past two years but would wait until he was offered one this year before deciding whether to accept it.